The link for this paper is below; it also appears in my introductory blog.(http://www.epa.ie/pubs/reports/research/sss/UniAberdeen_FrackingReport.pdf)
The key areas for further investigation are:
- seismic activity in subsurface geology and potential consequences
- likelihood of ground water contamination; concerning sources from both methane leakages and from the fracking fluid used
- potentially harmful chemical additives used in fracking fluid; particularly concentrating on American Legislature that allows companies to not disclose the composition of their fluid mixture
- the consequnces of elevated fluid pressure in wells and possible 'blow-outs'
- sourcing the millions of litres of water required to run one active well and the potential threats on local hydrogeology and ecology
- the disposal of spent fracking fluid
- the safety of fracking...Is it all about good practice?
Perhaps the most important issue raised by Healey is the current lack of scientific literature available, which is greatly outweighed by pseudo-science popularised by the media. This is a quote taken from page 10 of the report:
''Public debate in the US and elsewhere is polarised between an industry
funded
lobby on the one hand, and environmental groups on the other. Finding
the ‘truth’
about the tangible impacts on the environment from the mass of published,
non-peer
reviewed material, much of it comprising claim and counter-claim, is
non-trivial. There have
been relatively few published, peer-reviewed scientific reports into
the potential
environmental
impacts of fracking.''
No comments:
Post a Comment