Thursday, 31 October 2013

Methane Groundwater Contamination: Where To Start?

The subject of methane gas migration has become one of the most conentious and widely discussed topics relavent to the fracking debate. There is a vast expanse of literature available online, including journal articles and scientific papers that provide valuable information into the study of methane groundwater contamination, which I will evaluate in the next few posts. However, there is also an overwhelming abundance of news reports and articles presenting anecdotal evidence as fact, often with a limited scientific basis and a definite hint of scare-mongering. Current opinion is polarised, with claim and counter claim from anti-fracking activists and fracking industry leaders alike; it is my aim to carefully sift through this quagmire and present the facts without bias.

There has been huge public interest in this aspect of fracking, popularised by the 2010 film 'Gasland' by Josh Fox. Unfortunately, there is no online link available to the film but the associated website is available here- (http://one.gaslandthemovie.com/whats-fracking). This film clearly falls into the 'anti-fracking camp' but nontheless provides a thoughtful insight into the thousands of lives affected by groundwater contamination.

The most iconic image associated with this film is that of a woman setting her drinking water on fire as it emerges from the tap faucet. This proved to be a very effective method of capturing the attention of world-wide mass media and general public- lets be honest- who isn't shocked by the possibility of setting tap water on fire?




Like 'Gasland', most of the media attention has been focussed on the Marcellus Shale deposits of Pensylvannia, USA; deposited in the Appalachian Basin of Middle Devonian. These deposits consist of well bedded fossiliferous black shale units with high Total Organic Carbon content (1-11%), making it the largest deposit of natural gas trapped in low permeability shale in the USA- and hence the most economically important.

Since 2008 there has been a huge expansion of the drilling operations within the Marcellus Shale; this surge has been implicated as the underlying source of tainted drinking water in the region. Primary research has been conducted by Robert Jackson of Duke University, who undertook methane measurements in drinking water at increasing proximity to fracking wells. The results, as published in Scientific American indicate that : the closer one is situated to a well used for hydraulically fracturing shale for natural gas, the more likely it is that the drinking water is contaminated with methane.

The original report, published online in the Proceeding of the Natural Academy of Sciences is available here:
(http://www.pnas.org/content/108/20/8172.long)

With the sumarising articles of Scientific American avilable here:
(http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=fracking-for-natural-gas-pollutes-water-wells)
(http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=methane-in-pennsylvania-duke-study)

Jackson discovered methane in 115 of the 141 shallow residential drinking water wells, thats a huge 81.56%. Furthermore, homes within a 1 mile radius of the Fracking well showed a 6 fold increase in methane levels than those at futher distances.

Energy companies require unequivocal proof that the methane actually has its source in the Marcellus Shale Formation. This has been evaluated by comparing stable isotopes of carbon in methane from water samples with international standards using del notation:  
  δ = (Rsample/Rstandard – 1) * 1000.

The systemmatic collection of gas samples has led to a database, allowing 'isotopic finger-printing' of the gas. Jackson discovered that the isotopes are indicative of gas produced by thermal alteration of organic matter due to heat and pressure during burial.

However countering this, energy companies have claimed gas can rise naturally from deep formations through fissures in the rock and enter groundwater independantly of the fracking process. A claim supported in a scientific journal published by the National Groundwater Association which documents cases of flammable drinking water occuring since the 1700's.
A report summary is availbale here, from Energy In Depth:
(http://energyindepth.org/marcellus/study-naturally-occurring-methane-ubiquitous-in-ne-pa-groundwater/).

Cases of methane release are often associated with poor management of the pipe-line. Any ruptures in the metal casing or of the concrete surrounding the pipe can result in methane leaching. This highlights the need for universal supervison of borehole management and production.
Here is a link to providing information on borehole integrity:
(http://www.energyfromshale.org/environment/ground-water-protection)

 


 
    
     
 

 

 

 

 

Sunday, 27 October 2013

Getting Involved

 Over the past few weeks I have immersed myself in the world of anti-fracking and wider climate change activism. On the 16th of October, I attended the launch event for UCL Fossil Free (http://uclu.org/policy/up1231/fossil-free-ucl), a divestment campaign modelled on recent similar and successful movements in the United States. I also got involved at an anti-fracking demonstration on October the 23rd, organised by Frack Off London (http://frack-off.org.uk/local-group/frack-off-london/). Thankfully it was very peaceful and no kettling was involved!

 Events like these are commonplace, with much interest generated through social media and through the  extensive student network. They aim to bring the fracking process under greater scientific  scrutiny and express  the concern of  wider members of the public who have been bombarded with negative, and often contradictory, media coverage.

 UCL Fossil Free is a student body aimed at shifting over £10,000,000 of UCL investments in the fossil fuel industry to holdings that better represent UCL's ethical commitments. Within 6 months the campaign aims to withdraw all of UCL's investments from oil, gas and coal companies. These include Shell, Exxon and Rio Tinto. With some prominent speakers, such Dr. Simon Lewis from UCL's Geography department, the wheels were set in motion to begin a high-profile and high-impact campaign.

Pekka Piirainen, an event organisers for UCL Fossil Free, had this to say:

 'I question UCL's position as "a leader in tackling global challenges" whilst it is actively funding an industry that directly contributes to climate change. Take note of the hypocrisy of direct investments in projects that directly undermine the university's own research on anthropogenic climate change.

At current UCL continues to foster investments in companies whose ethical practices are circumspect at best. Our aim is to get UCL to adhere to its own self-professed values and climate change research. We are part of a wider global campaign aiming to put political pressure on the fossil fuel industry to stop ravaging the planet. An avalanche starts from a snowflake, and equally a social movement arises from the work of individuals.'

 UCL Fossil Free's petition, calling for UCL to review its investment policy regarding fossil fuels, can be found online at:
 (http://campaigns.gofossilfree.org/petitions/ucl-divest-from-fossil-fuels)

I also had a chance to get more directly involved with an anti-fracking campaign, going along to the October 23rd demonstration outside the Shale Gas Environmental Summit. The summit, labelled a 'greenwash' was, unsurprisingly, not highly regarded by the Occupy London movement (http://occupylondon.org.uk/greenwash-shale-gas-environmental-summit/). A small group of demonstrators gathered outside the Regent's Park Holiday Inn to protest against the controversial fracking industry. The following link shows some pictures of the event: (http://www.demotix.com/photo/3037442/london-frack-protest-outside-climate-deniers-fracking-conference). Organised by Frack Off! London, the demonstration aimed to highlight the environmental concerns associated with shale gas extraction. The main points raised related to the high carbon-footprint of fracking and the possibility of large scale environmental disasters, such as methane leaks and groundwater contamination. Particular attention was paid to the necessity to preserve the ecological viability of the British countryside.

Tuesday, 22 October 2013

Seismic Activity in Blackpool associated with Fracking

On 27/03/11 and 01/04/11 two, low magitude seismic events were recorded in Blackpool(http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-lancashire-15550458). The Earthquakes, measuring only 1.5 and 2.3 on the Richter Scale respectively, occured in the vicinity of the Preese Hall fracking site run by Caudrilla Resources ( http://www.cuadrillaresources.com/).

The BGS installed temporary recording devices after the 1st earthquake and were subsequently able to locate to epicentre of the second just 500m from the site.

Here is a link to the BGS Blackpool map showing the epicentre localities: (http://earthquakes.bgs.ac.uk/research/earthquake_hazard_shale_gas.html).

The result of these very small magnitude of these anthropogenic earthquakes was a temporary suspension in fracking practices at the site. The company in charge, Caudrilla Resources, also commissioned independent studies into the complex relationship between the process of hydraulic fracturing and so called 'micro-seismicity' at their site. Caudrila claim that future earthquaes have a very low probability of repeat occurence however as explain in this paper, the answer is not so simple:(https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/48330/5055-preese-hall-shale-gas-fracturing-review-and-recomm.pdf).

To summarise, the study was unable to definitively locate the 'causative fault' and have made suggestions for further field data. This includes a 3D seismic survey to identify the underlying fracture pattern in the basin.

The most important aspect to take from this report is about 'Hazard Mitigation' and the importance of continuous, passive monitoring- i.e identification of a possible hazard before the event takes place. Take a look at this link to LandTech, a company which provide fracking-induced seismic monitering for large fracking companies ( http://www.landtechsa.com/default.aspx?c=030200)




Here is a useful (but very long!) link to a pdf on Micro-Seismicity:
(http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=6&ved=0CGgQFjAF&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.api.org%2F~%2Fmedia%2FFiles%2FPolicy%2FHydraulic_Fracturing%2FFacts-HF-and-Seismic-Activity.pdf&ei=vrNlUu6OA6K-0QWG-IHIAw&usg=AFQjCNHrrew-8A_U-nXBLFzLJhi4sNkBzQ&sig2=hmlzMut9_c5FQhh9DDeMOg&bvm=bv.55123115,d.d2k)

And a link to methods used to monitor Micro- Seismicity:
(http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=8&ved=0CHMQFjAH&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cspg.org%2Fdocuments%2FConventions%2FArchives%2FAnnual%2F2011%2F255-What_Does_Microseismic_Tell_Us.pdf&ei=vrNlUu6OA6K-0QWG-IHIAw&usg=AFQjCNHXjO7I6X8SHfR6S65vztla8WOplg&sig2=q6GFfZynZDfl7zwFIUMC7A&bvm=bv.55123115,d.d2k)



Wednesday, 16 October 2013

Links for 'key areas of investigation'





  • Seismic activity in subsurface geology and potential consequences

  • BBC article with video on seismic activity in Blackpool, UK.-
    (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-lancashire-15550458)
    Short article by the Guardian on the same topic-
    (http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2011/jun/01/blackpool-earthquake-tremors-gas-drilling)
    BSGS report 'Fracking and Earthquake Hazard'-
    (http://earthquakes.bgs.ac.uk/research/earthquake_hazard_shale_gas.html)

  • Likelihood of ground water contamination; concerning sources from both methane leakages and from the fracking fluid used

  • Scientific American 'Groundwater Contamination May End the Gas Fracking Boom-
    (http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=groundwater-contamination-may-end-the-gas-fracking-boom)
    Light-hearted article by Prorepublica on heavy metal ground water contamination-
    (http://www.propublica.org/article/new-study-finds-high-levels-of-arsenic-in-groundwater-near-fracking-sites)
    Scientific paper: Methane Contamination of drinking water accompanying gas-well drilling and hydraulic fracturing-
    (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3100993/)


  • Potentially harmful chemical additives used in fracking fluid; particularly concentrating on American Legislature that allows companies to not disclose the composition of their fluid mixture

  • Cool website with lots of info-
    (http://www.dangersoffracking.com/)
    Nature article on disclosing content of fracking fluid-
    (http://www.nature.com/news/secrets-of-fracking-fluids-pave-way-for-cleaner-recipe-1.13719)
    Science Direct- Regulating hydraulic fracturing in shale gas plays- The case of Texas
    (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421511001893)


  • The consequences of elevated fluid pressure in wells and possible 'blowouts'

  • CBC News- Fracking to blame for well blowout near Innisfail-
    (http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/fracking-to-blame-for-well-blowout-near-innisfail-1.1191497)
    YouTube video of blowout Canton, Bradford County, USA-
    (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fqMUY9gdRSQ)



  • Sourcing the millions of litres of water required to run one active well and the potential threats on local hydrogeology and ecology

  • Carbon Briefing blog on water use-
    (http://www.carbonbrief.org/blog/2013/08/carbon-briefing-could-shale-gas-suck-our-rivers-dry/)
    Energy Facts: How Much Water Does Fracking for Shale Gas Consume?
    (http://theenergycollective.com/jessejenkins/205481/friday-energy-facts-how-much-water-does-fracking-shale-gas-consume)
     'Hydraulic Fracturing and Water Resources, separating the frack from fiction'; there is a link in the text to full scientific report-
    http://www.pacinst.org/publication/hydraulic-fracturing-and-water-resources-separating-the-frack-from-the-fiction/

  • The disposal of spent fracking fluid

  • Blog- Where does fracking water go?
    http://blogs.reuters.com/muniland/2011/12/30/where-does-fracking-water-go/
    Scientific paper, DukeSpace- Wastewater generation and disposal from Natural Gas Fracking-
    (http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=6&ved=0CFsQFjAF&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdukespace.lib.duke.edu%2Fdspace%2Fbitstream%2Fhandle%2F10161%2F5320%2FLewis_MP2.pdf&ei=vSFfUsvGEbCO7Ab34oGYCQ&usg=AFQjCNFyXVJrW-tw4HOc5pEc0I6EWnzJoA&sig2=Lw4HVIguoriGZ3KzHlUTZA)

  • The safety of fracking...Is it all about good practice?

  • Blog; Scientific American-
    (http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/plugged-in/2012/01/25/guest-post-water-contamination-fracking-is-not-the-problem/)
    Frackwire; Fracking and well casing failure-
    (http://frackwire.com/well-casing-failure/)
    Online Wall Street Journal- Well Sealing cited in Leaks, Not Fracking-
    (http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424127887323998604578567853193607238)




    Scientific Journal Review

    'Hydraulic Fracturing or Fracking: A Short Summary of Current Knowledge and Potential Environmental Impacts' may sound a little dry for a Wednesday afternoon, but upon further inspection this report compiled by Dr Dave Healey of Aberdeen University raises some important issues concerning the future of fracking in the UK. The paper also provides an excellent base knowledge of the fracking process which builds upon information from my previous post- 'What Is Fracking?' During the next few posts I hope to explore in further detail the key themes that I have taken away from this paper. I aim to do this by collating evidence from supplementary scientific journals and other media resources.

    The link for this paper is below; it also appears in my introductory blog.(http://www.epa.ie/pubs/reports/research/sss/UniAberdeen_FrackingReport.pdf)

    The key areas for further investigation are:
    • seismic activity in subsurface geology and potential consequences
    • likelihood of ground water contamination; concerning sources from both methane leakages and from the fracking fluid used
    • potentially harmful chemical additives used in fracking fluid; particularly concentrating on American Legislature that allows companies to not disclose the composition of their fluid mixture
    • the consequnces of elevated fluid pressure in wells and possible 'blow-outs'
    • sourcing the millions of litres of water required to run one active well and the potential threats on local hydrogeology and ecology
    • the disposal of spent fracking fluid
    • the safety of fracking...Is it all about good practice?
    Well, that should keep me busy for at least the next couple of weeks!


    Perhaps the most important issue raised by Healey is the current lack of scientific literature available, which is greatly outweighed by pseudo-science popularised by the media. This is a quote taken from page 10 of the report:

     
    ''Public debate in the US and elsewhere is polarised between an industry funded

    lobby on the one hand, and environmental groups on the other. Finding the ‘truth’

    about the tangible impacts on the environment from the mass of published, non-peer

    reviewed material, much of it comprising claim and counter-claim, is non-trivial. There have

    been relatively few published, peer-reviewed scientific reports into the potential

    environmental impacts of fracking.''




    Monday, 14 October 2013

    What Is Fracking?

    So, the logical place to start is at the beginning...

    What actually is Fracking?

    Essentially, hydraulic fracturing (or fracking as it is more commonly known) is the recovery of natural gas from shale formations situated deep underground, usually at depths of 2-3 km. Fracking has only come to the forefront of the energy race due to recent developments in horizontal drilling practices that have led to the economically viable recovery of  shale gas.

     Shale formations are composed of the fossilferous remains of ancient microorganisms and fine grained clay sediments that have settled from suspension in ancient, low energy waters. When the sediment is buried and compacted thermogenic degradation takes place. If the specific temperature and pressure parameters of the 'thermogenic window' are satisfied, the organic carbon content can be turned into methane gas.

    Unlike the usual recovery of natural gas from porous resevoir rocks such as sandstones, the very low permeability of the shale ensures the methane remains trapped in tiny pore spaces in situ. The shale formation acts as the source rock, the resevoir rock and the trap rock.

    The very high pressures of the injected fluid causes local shale to fracture, releasing the trapped methane. The fissures created in this process allow the natural gas to migrate into the well and then be tapped and stored as a valuable energy source.

    Here are some cool links to provide you with the basics on fracking-

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-14432401

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lB3FOJjpy7s





     
     
     

    Saturday, 12 October 2013

    BBC Horizon 2013 Fracking The New Energy Rush

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=L9z6gPhpHcE


    This BBC Horizon documentary presented by Britains favourite geologist, Dr Iain Stewart, is a great place to start for the fracking novice. This is a thought provoking and well shot piece that explores the recent fracking boom, particularly concentrating on Southern USA.

    Stewart eloquently describes the complex interplay of geology, politics and economics that confound the fracking debate. I have begun to realise that there is no simple answer to the obvious question- 'Should fracking be taking place?'

    The economic gains are in fact undeniable. The shale formations in the USA are believed to contain more natural gas than there is oil in Saudi Arabia. In Layman's terms.... that is a lot of gas. Stewart touches upon the 'energy renaissance' in America, where this explosive new industry has led to cheap, abundant and most importantly home-grown energy. Currently, the UK imports over half of its natural gas from foreign countries including Qatar, Russia and parts of Africa. This leaves us lacking in 'energy security' and vulnerable to changes in the global market.

    So, with gas prices a third cheaper in the USA than in the UK,  the huge economic boost and ample employment opportunities- shouldn't Britain also get a slice of the proverbial pie?

    Ultimately, this documentary will leave you with more questions about the possible consequences of fracking than answers. To touch upon a few-

    Should we be investing in another carbon based energy source?
    Does fracking cause ground water contamination?
    Can it cause increased seismic activity?

    I hope to explore these themes in the coming weeks.

    Brief Introductions

    As an undergraduate Earth Science student, in recent months the contentious subject of fracking has been impossible to avoid. With almost daily publishing of news articles (http://www.theguardian.com/environment/shale-gas), documentaries (http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=L9z6gPhpHcE) and scientific papers (http://www.epa.ie/pubs/reports/research/sss/UniAberdeen_FrackingReport.pdf), it seems like everyone has an opinion.

    The mass-media whirlwind surrounding the fracking industry has left me feeling slightly confused... surely I can't be the only one? Throughout this blog I hope to sift through the quagmire of contradictory 'information' and try to present some geniune scientific evidence about the advantages and disadvantages of fracking.

    Climate and environmental change is a subject close to my heart and has been the real inspiration for this blog. Plus with so many controversial topics that come under the mammoth umbrella of fracking, the possibilities for discovery are endless.